18106 Nis, Serbia +381 62 9648511

What if NASA had the US Military’s Budget? ($600B)

“Space, the final frontier. Except, we don’t have cool spaceships because the US government has a bit of a thing for aircraft carriers”

Once I realized that the US military’s budget is so much thicker than NASA’s, I found this topic to be fascinating. If you’re just looking for a video with the same title that inspired me to start thinking about this, it’s further down.

While it isn’t realistic that US government would switch NASA’s and Military’s budget anytime soon, it would be realistic to balance things out a bit.

when thanos finally gets the kidney stone
-Not the Thanos kind of balance though

To be honest, USA doesn’t really need a 600B annual budget for the military. Unless they plan on going to war against China, Russia, India and Serbia* at the same time.

Anyway, US military could easily do well with a $150B cut in their budget, and the entire world would benefit from that. Actually, if a government wants to advance their warfare capabilities in the long run, science might be even better way to go than investing billions into aircraft carriers. Just saying.

*Serbia part was a joke

Related articles

A possible Solution to the Fermi Paradox – part 1

Specimen Wendy Wright, image 001 Specimen Wendy Wright, image 002 Specimen Wendy Wright, image 003

Learn More

The Poetry of Science: Richard Dawkins and Neil deGrasse Tyson

It really is a pleasure to see two people with clear minds and sound logic have a constructive conversation: no logical fallacies, just a normal conversation on important topics – “a kind of mutual tutorial […]

Learn More

Drop Everything And Read The Ridiculous Terms And Conditions For Elon Musk’s Flamethrower

The terms and condition for the Boring Company’s new flamethrower – ahem, Not-a-Flamethrower – are anything but. Naturally, the eccentric billionaire (and real-life Bruce Wayne) would come out with ludicrous rules for his already outrageous new […]

Learn More

We would love to hear what you have to say about this: